Municipal Corporation Election Campaign
Household-level targeting made viable by the small size of each ward.
- 46 / 60
- Wards Won
- 76%
- Strike Rate
- +14%
- Swing Voters
Contact coverage that is measured, not assumed.
Door-to-door campaigns, padayatras, corner meetings and outreach events planned against booth targets and tracked to completion.
Short answer
Door-to-door campaigns, padayatras, corner meetings and outreach events planned against booth targets and tracked to completion.
The Challenge
Ground campaigns are often measured by effort rather than coverage. Everyone is busy, the candidate is exhausted, and nobody can state what percentage of target voters were actually contacted.
Our Approach
Contact targets are set per booth from the margin requirement, then converted into a routed daily schedule.
The candidate’s hours are the scarcest resource in any campaign and are allocated against booth value, not invitation volume.
Corner meetings, padayatras and community interactions are sequenced to build visible momentum toward the final week.
Every interaction is recorded so coverage is a number on a dashboard rather than a claim in a meeting.
Weekly review reallocates teams to booths falling behind coverage target.
Engagement Timeline
T-90
Coverage planning
T-75
Team deployment
T-75 to T-10
Sustained contact drive
T-10 to T-2
Final push
Handover and review
In Practice
Household-level targeting made viable by the small size of each ward.
Sixty simultaneous micro-contests, each decided by a few hundred votes, with a compressed announcement-to-poll window and candidates of highly uneven quality.
Read the full case studyFAQ
It depends on the margin required and the competitiveness of the seat. We set the target from the booth model rather than applying a generic percentage.
Related