Skip to content

The Ethics of Political Consulting

The techniques that make a consultancy effective in the short term are frequently the ones that make democratic competition worse. Where the line sits, and why we draw it there.

Ethics4 May 20269 min readPolitical Strategy Warfare

Short answer

The Ethics of Political Consulting — in short

The techniques that make a consultancy effective in the short term are frequently the ones that make democratic competition worse. Where the line sits, and why we draw it there.

A political consultancy is asked, fairly often, to do things it should not do. Not usually in those terms — the request arrives as a question about what is possible, and the answer determines whether the conversation continues.

What we decline

  • Fake accounts, bot networks and coordinated inauthentic behaviour of any kind.
  • Creating or knowingly spreading misinformation, including as a response to misinformation.
  • Paid trolling or organised harassment.
  • Any activity designed to suppress voter participation.
  • Facilitating inducements to voters.
  • Impersonation of individuals, organisations or media outlets.
  • Paying for editorial coverage presented as independent journalism.

These are not aspirations. They are the reason certain engagements do not proceed past the first meeting, and that has a real revenue cost.

The harder cases

The clear prohibitions are easy. The genuinely difficult questions sit in the middle of the range.

Targeted messaging

Telling different segments different things is legitimate when both statements are true and consistent with the same platform. It becomes deception the moment the messages contradict each other. The working test we apply: would this campaign survive every targeted message being published side by side? If not, it should not be sent.

Negative campaigning

Drawing attention to an opponent’s documented record is a legitimate part of democratic competition; voters are entitled to that information. Fabricating a record, or amplifying an unverified claim because it is useful, is not. The distinction is whether the claim is true and sourced, not whether it is unkind.

Emotional appeal

Politics is legitimately emotional, and campaigns that pretend otherwise are ineffective and slightly dishonest about human beings. The line sits at manufactured grievance — constructing an antagonism that does not exist because it mobilises well.

Why this is written down

A code that lives in people’s heads is a code that bends under pressure at 11pm eleven days before polling. Ours is published, it is a condition of partnership for anyone we work with, and it is the reference we point to when a client asks for something we will not do.

  • #ethics
  • #code of conduct

Political Strategy Warfare

We work on Indian campaigns and governance mandates — booth-level research, message architecture, field systems and delivery. What we publish here is method we have used, not commentary.

About the firm

Related reading

Data & Research

14 Jul 2026 · 9 min read

The Constituency Is the Wrong Unit of Analysis

Campaign decisions are routinely made on constituency averages that describe no actual place. The booth is the correct unit, and the data to work at that level is public.

Read Article
Communications

2 Jul 2026 · 7 min read

Why Your Slogan Failed the Translation Test

Slogans written in English and translated into the campaign language are the most common self-inflicted wound in Indian campaigns. Here is how to test before you print.

Read Article
Communications

20 Jun 2026 · 8 min read

The First Six Hours of a Political Crisis

Crises are not lost in the response. They are lost in the hours spent deciding whether to respond and who is allowed to speak.

Read Article

Apply this to your campaign

Book a Strategy Call